Shared assets repository

BNA! · **Posted:** Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:49 pm

whitewolf wrote:

Quote:

Usually when 1% of the assests become a problem, then they tend to mess up the 99%, especially if the 1% are the real good ones and the 99% are just fillers.

#Occupy assets
couldn't resist

Me neither :lol:

shadowscrawl · **Posted:** Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:23 pm

Deadite4 wrote:

I guess it would depend on the intent of the repo if it would be a problem. Is this meant to be able to be a "download and develop" type of repo right out of the box, or will it be a repo that contains what you need to get started but final file structure of your project is up to you. In the latter case, folder depths would be of no concern as its expected the person using it to develop will have made their own structure to their needs of the assets.

i agree with this

using an versioning system implies that everyone who downloads the assets will be using them as is in their current structure or otherwise would involve the annoying process of having to deconstruct someone elses preferred structure to re-esemble ones own

personally i would MUCH rather simply have gallery of assets that can be browsed and picked from in a more modular manner

also @whitewolf hahaha that was exactly what i was thinking when i read that bit about the 99%

-edit-

sooooo is this whole shared repo thing dead? its been quite a while since anyone has mentioned anything here :/

BloodRayne · **Posted:** Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:16 am

jeack wrote:

I think you said is good ,I am intensity agree it

Lucky078 wrote:

This is necessary,i agreed with you.

I think both these posts are spambots.

The Happy Friar · **Posted:** Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:36 pm

I agree with what you said.

:mrgreen:

BloodRayne · **Posted:** Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:19 pm

I necessarily agree on the botanical aspects of that, golf clubs included. :idea:

lol

BNA! · **Posted:** Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:33 am

BloodRayne wrote:

jeack wrote:

I think you said is good ,I am intensity agree it

Lucky078 wrote:

This is necessary,i agreed with you.

I think both these posts are spambots.

I think you said is good ,I am intensity agree it

Neurological · **Joined:** Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:54 am **Posts:** 455

Just posted here some of my old assets:

viewtopic.php?f=39&t=25881

Douglas Quaid · **Posted:** Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:41 pm

Desktop Icons - viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25932
Horror Sounds - viewtopic.php?f=13&t=25934&p=242922#p242922

Doom3world

Shared assets repository

Who is online